-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Siouxland lawmakers weigh in on the president’s rejection of the Keystone XL
JUDY WOODRUFF: President Obama had faced considerable pressure from the left to act, while he kept his own opinion under wraps. “Today, misplaced symbolism was chosen over merit and science – rhetoric won out over reason”.
Advertisement
In making his decision, the president said the project would undercut the country’s leadership position on climate change.
Democrats and environmental groups have ratcheted up pressure on Obama to reject the pipeline ahead of this important climate change meeting, arguing that doing so would send a clear message about the USA resolve to combat climate change, according to the Hill, a political news website.
The President announced earlier on Friday that he officially rejected the request from a Canadian company to build the Keystone XL Pipeline.
Supporters of the Keystone deal believed the project would create thousands of jobs and allow for a more stable way to transport oil between Canada and the Gulf Coast of the United States.
TransCanada, for its part, slammed the decision in a press release. “This announcement, along with the President’s proposed carbon plan, are evidence that his energy and economic policies are out of touch with the needs of Arkansans”.
161-c-23-(Mark Smith, AP White House correspondent)-“energy infrastructure project”-AP White House Correspondent Mark Smith reports the pipeline’s operator is now considering its next move”.
“We finally have the “yes” or “no” the President could not give years ago”.
Advertisement
There has been a contentious debate over the pipeline for the past seven years. “Together, ranchers, tribal nations, and everyday people beat this project back, reminding the world that Big Oil isn’t invincible – and that organized people can win over organized money”. The pipeline requires a presidential permit to cross the U.S.- Canadian border. She suggested that will improve Alberta’s worldwide reputation and make approvals of future projects more likely. “I agree with that decision”, said Obama.