This year’s conference, also known as the 2015 Paris Climate Conference, is seeking to achieve a legally-binding and universal agreement on protecting the environment – for the first time in over 20 years of UN-mandated negotiations – with the aim of keeping global warming below 2 degrees Celsius.
Advertisement
According to Greenpeace Head of International Climate Politics Martin Kaiser, “the atmosphere remains constructive”.
Business Standard accessed the proposal that the United States put forth informally before other countries demanding that poor and vulnerable countries give up any future rights to demand compensation or create any form of legal liability upon developed countries.
“The countries that are looking to compromise on this with the U.S., the question is what will they seek in the bargain?”
He is at the UN Climate Conference in Paris.
In this second week, the French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius in his capacity as president of the COP will be taking over the process of running the conference – bridging the remaining differences and finding the final language that everyone can live.
The J/P Haitian Relief Organisation of which he was a co-founder had a ten-year plan to restore the forest ecosystem, incentivise a civilian protection corps, and help Haitians to enrich their own soils in a community project driven by Haitians, with worldwide support.
“We have heard some say we do not live up to our responsibilities and this could not be further from the truth”, European Climate and Energy Commissioner Miguel Arias Canete said in Paris. They realised that their task, to produce the Paris agreement on climate action after 2020, is all-important, whatever good rhetoric the political leaders may come up with.
Penn praised the climate negotiators in Paris, saying “this is the most exciting time in human history because… we have clarity and the days of dreams have given way to the days of doing”. He says, in OR, the shellfish industry is suffering, forest fires are prevalent and the Cascade Mountains are seeing a smaller snowpack. Many, including the United States and China, clearly identified that with action comes opportunity.
In short, President Obama thinks his successor will lead-as he does-from behind.
Whereas the current commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol covers countries (Europe and New Zealand) that account for no more than 14 percent of global emissions (and 0 percent of global emissions growth), Intended Nationally Determined Contributions have already been submitted for the Paris agreement by 180 of the participating 196 parties, representing fully 95 percent of global emissions.
There are many issues in the talks that started Sunday and continue through mid-December. We will not let this meeting fail to reach its objectives.
Meanwhile, US actor and former governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger yesterday met with China’s chief climate negotiator at the climate talks in Paris. Many Congressional Republicans doubt global warming is real, or fear that stringent controls of carbon emissions could kill jobs.
“We can not accept that because to accept that is to destroy our societies”, he said to applause.
That new approach frustrates some, particularly in Europe, who would prefer to see pollution improvements mandated by worldwide law. “There’s no doubt about that”.
Asked about the issue at a news briefing, Chinese negotiator Su Wei said simply: “Transparency would be very important to build mutual confidence and trust”.
“We have to further discuss… try to find some proper solution”, he said.
The chairman of the working group that had been working on the draft gaveled it just before a noon (1100 GMT) deadline after agreeing to make some cosmetic changes requested by various delegations.
Many disagreements remain, nearly all related to defining the obligations and expectations of rich and poor countries, as well as those who don’t fit neatly into either category. Even though they have already liberalized unilaterally, many of these countries now avoid making concessions at the WTO by claiming treatment as developing nations.
Ministers now have a week to negotiate the final outcome.
“At this point in Copenhagen we were dealing with a 300-page text and a pervasive sense of despair”.
“In climate change, there are only a handful of countries that are really causing the emissions problem”, Bell said.
Advertisement
Senior negotiators and long-time observers believe there will be a way through the sticking points. But many developing nations have balked at such provisions, calling them intrusive and a potential violation of sovereignty.
