It’s nearly as if having agreed to anything is worthy of congratulations.
Advertisement
Political leaders, analysts welcome Nawaz-Modi meeting
Modi was offered meals prepared in “desi ghee” with Kashmiri tea, mixed veg, kheer and palak paneer on the menu. Ma praised the Modi Government for its outreach to Pakistan.
All that can save this movement is an extreme weather event (to be blamed, as always, on climate change) – or climate activists’ decision to try something new rather than repeat the tactics that have failed so often despite so much effort. Countries will also work to cut emissions as soon as possible, focusing on using morerenewable energy solutions in order to bring emissions down over the coming century. We interpret this language as being the same as the better known requirement of “zero net emissions”.
In surprise visit, Indian PM Modi briefly stops in Pakistan
The U.S. has always believed that as the larger country in South Asia, India should be more magnanimous towards its neighbours. He stated the development in relations between the 2 nations was vital to regional peace, stability and improvement.
Last week, Ford Motor Co. said it plans to invest $4.5 billion in electric vehicles to meet ambitious new auto emissions standards put in place by the Obama administration.
Leicester, Arsenal lose to tighten table; more pressure for van Gaal
Chelsea drew 2-2 with Watford in Guus Hiddink’s debut as caretaker manager as Oscar missed a second-half penalty when he slipped. Manchester City occupies third place in the Premier League standings ahead of Sunderland’s visit.
“It provides that every five years there will be a collective stocktaking”.
Countries must agree by consensus. Those global industry leaders were a key part of building momentum for an worldwide agreement with all governments on board.
For now, it appears parties are leaning toward mostly an honor system agreement, with individual countries making pledges that won’t necessarily be enforced by any world court or body.
McCaffrey added that she hoped this would be translated into the “necessary politics at home” to achieve these goals, “with ministers returning from the talks fired up to put their weight fully behind the development of the UK’s plentiful renewable energy resources, including wind, wave and tidal power, without the government seeking to exclude successful and cost-effective technologies such as onshore wind from our energy mix”. In the end, the issue was included, but a footnote specifically stated that loss and damage does not involve liability or compensation. The text does not mention worldwide aviation or shipping emissions.
He, like many others, paid tribute to the French, who are credited with delivering a master-class in diplomacy in steering the deal through tense and hard negotiations to achieve agreement. Numerous goals are simply aspirational.
The Kyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions was adopted in 1997.
Some environmental groups and people already suffering on the frontlines of climate change say the agreement doesn’t commit enough money to helping the most vulnerable communities. There is nothing in the Agreement that requires countries to actually make greater efforts.
After years of buildup and weeks of negotiations, diplomats issued a final draft of a climate change agreement Saturday that the French foreign minister described as “fair… and legally binding”. Whatever clever words are devised to hide the reality of what emerges from this conference, there is no way the world as a whole is going to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.
He said it was clear that “non-state actors” such as local government and business had the strongest influence, and France had very firmly given governments the message: “You need to rise to the occasion”.
Then there is the question of funding. Let’s see if that happens.
WWF head of delegation to COP 21, Tasneem Essop said the Paris Agreement was an important milestone. Perhaps achieving anything like this Agreement in this era of political, economic and social turmoil is indeed an achievement.
And many hope the battle lines will fade as new low-carbon technologies are developed, costs come down and a hoped-for global price on CO2 – a vital pollution-cutting incentive – emerges.
Equally contentious behind the scenes, prompting the US Secretary of State John Kerry at one point to threaten to walk out altogether, was the idea that the rich countries of the West are genuinely prepared to shell out $100 billion every year after 2020 to help poorer nations rely only on wind and sun for their energy.
Advertisement
I wasn’t following the climate story in the summer of 1988, when George H.W. Bush, campaigning for his first term, said, “Those who think we are powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect forget about the White House effect; as President, I intend to do something about it”. Today, most regard it as a failure.
