The EEOC has already found that when an employer discriminates a gay employee for being effeminate – or a lesbian employee for being butch – that qualifies as illegal sex stereotyping. “‘Sexual orientation’ as a concept can not be defined or understood without reference to sex”.
Advertisement
The EEOC decision redacted the name of the airport employee who filed the claim, but it did name the defendants: U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx and the Federal Aviation Administration. It will help to governs complaints which might be filed with the offices guided by the commission. But embedding the new protections in the text of a legendary law would be a powerful symbol of the inclusion of gay, lesbian and transgender Americans in the promise of equality. “This is groundbreaking because this is the same sort of decision for lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers as we had in 2012 for trans workers”, wrote Geidner. The FAA contended the position was never filled, so no discrimination occurred. “Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people all across the country now have a place to turn if an employer fires them because of their sexual orientation”.
It’s similar to how racial discrimination extends to relationships.
“Sexual orientation is inherently a sex-based consideration”, the EEOC explained. “It’s time for LGBT advocates to retire the incorrect talking point that gay Americans can get married at Noon and fired at 2:00 pm without legal recourse”.
Have you ever been the victim of workplace discrimination? You really have to wonder if business owners are up to the challenge of making decisions based exclusively on whether or not someone is good at his job.
While the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not explicitly guarantee rights based on sexual orientation, the EEOC said that such discrimination is ultimately based on sex-which is protected by the law. “With a recent report showing that housing discrimination against LGBT elders is rampant, this is just the kind of leadership we need from the federal government”. On its face, the Court’s opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges applies only to marriage, not to other civil rights.
BuzzFeed first reported the ruling, which was issued Wednesday without objection from any member of the five-person commission. But the court ruled against him, holding that Title VII did not protect men against sex discrimination by male co-workers. (Federal law is silent about sex discrimination in areas like accommodations and programs that receive federal funds, outside of education.). Although the Supreme Court has final say in such matters, the panel’s ruling would carry significant weight in a future decision by the high court.
That will change, however, if the courts agree with a federal agency’s ruling that current federal law prohibits many forms of anti-gay discrimination. Most of these activists contend that legislation is also necessary, but that it is a long way off given the Republican-controlled Congress. They argue that litigation produced most of the pivotal victories for the movement on the marriage issue, and that Chief Justice John G.
Tico Almeida, the head of Freedom to Work, celebrated the decision – and urged LGBT groups to go to the courts to seek codification of the ruling. “That is a legitimate claim… that sex was unlawfully taken into account in the adverse discrimination action”.
Advertisement
An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the partisan makeup of the commission. The goal would be to add sexual orientation and gender identity to that list, rather than craft a separate statute along the lines of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
