-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $100 million over cancer death
“The sad part is, she had to learn about it from lawyer ads, while Johnson & Johnson tried to hide the truth from her”, Salter said.
Advertisement
The lead attorneys in a $72 million jury award are sending out a warning about talcum powder and the risk of ovarian cancer.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has been ordered to pay million to a family of a woman that died from ovarian cancer.
Well, a Missouri state jury agreed, ruling against Johnson & Johnson, the makers of a talcum-based Baby Powder and Shower to Shower talc reportedly used by Fox.
In a verdict pronounced late Monday night, jurors in the circuit court of St Louis awarded the family of $62 million of punitive damages and Jacqueline Fox $10 million of actual damages, as stated by the family’s lawyers and court records. “This is the first time for a US jury to award damages over the claims”. Jacqueline Fox died in October, at 62, after using J&J powder products for 35 years.
Johnson & Johnson faces claims that it, in a attempt to boost sales, neglected to warn consumers that its talc-based products could cause cancer.
According to Reuters, about 1,000 cases have been filed in Missouri state court, and another 200 in New Jersey against the company on charges of being aware of the risks as far back as the 1980 but allegedly choosing profits over the lives of its customers. After her cancer diagnosis, Jackie Fox joined dozens of women suing the company for what they said was a failure to inform consumers about the dangers of talc.
So the case essentially boils down to two questions: Does talc cause cancer and, if it does, did Johnson & Johnson know about it?
“The recent USA verdict goes against decades of sound science proving the safety of talc as a cosmetic ingredient in multiple products, and while we sympathize with the family of the plaintiff, we strongly disagree with the outcome”, Goodrich said.
Advertisement
Some studies suggest a link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, but scientists say it’s not clear yet whether products containing talc can cause the disease.