-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Google Loses Bid to Overturn Low-Cost Patent Licenses To Microsoft
The appeals court has also upheld a jury’s decision to award $14.5 million to Microsoft in a related trial.
Advertisement
The jury decision specifically related to Google’s Motorola – now owned by Lenovo – breaching “its obligation to license the patents on fair and reasonable terms” explains the report.
New york city In an obstacle for Google Inc (GOOGL.O), a You can include.S.is attractive legal procedure controlled on Thursday the fact that the low certification ratio Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) makes sense to dip into the stash of Google’s Motorola Mobility asset appeared to be accurately set up.
The dispute began after Motorola sent a letter to Microsoft asking it to pay as much as $4 billion per year to license patents relating to the 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi and the H.264 video encoding standard.
This massive damage demand was clearly a response to Microsoft’s opening salvo-but two courts have now found that doesn’t matter. Microsoft alleged that Motorola had breached that contract and sued. This was a major setback for Google for the appeals court to rule that the low licensing rate Microsoft pays to use Google’s Motorola Mobility patents have been properly set.
The Microsoft-Motorola trial was highly technical, but it was important in that no federal judge had before decided just what the oft-used “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory” standard meant.
The 9 US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said a lower court judge properly determined the patents’ value even though the royalty rate was only a fraction of what Motorola had asked for. Apple and Intel filed briefs in support of Microsoft, while Qualcomm and Nokia sided with Motorola.
Google appealed the verdict and the royalty rate to the 9 Circuit.
It’s not clear yet what the future holds for this case.