-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
SC rejects plea of Vedanta to export iron ore from Karnataka
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected Vedanta Ltd’s plea seeking export of iron ore in Karnataka.
Advertisement
The apex court, which heard the plea filed by the Karnataka Iron and Steel Manufacturers’ Association, seeking intervention to stop state-owned National Mineral Development Corp. The committee had denied permission to export iron ore. The diversified natural resources group had contested a court-appointed monitoring panel’s decision to disallow the company from exporting iron ore.
The public sector undertaking had also told the court that “despite the price being higher in Karnataka than in Chhattisgarh, the cost of landing in Karnataka is lower than in Chhattisgarh”.
However, responding to Vedanta Group’s appeal to refer the case to the High Court for adjudication, the Supreme court declared that that it “doesn’t find any reason to allow export of iron ore for now”.
Under dual pricing, NMDC sells iron ore at different prices in different states.
While the apex court allowed resumption of mining in April 2013, it enforced an annual cap of 30 million tonnes besides the exports were also banned.
Advertisement
Not accepting the CEC stand, the bench said, “While it is correct that the special dispensation granted to NMDC by this court can not continue in perpetuity and the regulatory measures prescribed by this court for other leaseholders must also apply to NMDC, the working of its leases by NMDC under the special dispensation, by itself, can not be a legitimate ground for not resorting to a dual price mechanism if the same is dictated by market forces”. A directive to the monitoring committee to fix a base price for iron ore was also rejected.