-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Trial over NC’s HB2 delayed until May 2017, attorney says
Sign posted at Bull McCabes Irish Pub on May 10, 2016 in Durham, North Carolina.
Advertisement
James Esseks, an ACLU lawyer on the team representing three transgender residents, said the judge’s order means the case will be pushed back from its November trial date until May 2017.
A lawyer says that a trial over a North Carolina law governing transgender restroom access is being pushed back by several months. The states also argue the North Carolina proceedings should be halted temporarily because of that ruling and a Virginia case that the U.S. Supreme Court may hear.
North Carolina’s so-called H.B.
Schroeder also noted that existing state laws that prohibit people from indecently exposing themselves to others or peeping into or entering a bathroom designated for someone of the opposite sex are “straightforward and uncontroversial”.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and attorney generals from Arkansas, Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Utah and the governors of Kentucky and MS filed a brief in federal court on August 31 to block a U.S. Justice Department challenge to North Carolina’s House Bill 2 (HB2).
Judge Thomas D. Schroeder of Federal District Court partly granted apreliminary injunction for three transgender plaintiffs, saying they have a strong chance of proving their arguments that H.B. Therefore, he said, his injunction simply returns to the pre-HB2 scheme until the court can rule whether Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination based on “sex” includes “gender identity”. They have asked an appeals court to expand that ruling to all transgender people in the state, not just those involved in the lawsuit.
Advertisement
Follow NBC OUT on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.