In one portion, the report alleges that a Russian official said outright that Snowden shared secrets with the Russian government-which Snowden notes is “speculation presented as fact”.
Advertisement
Although Snowden wraps up too neatly in the end – possibly due to the still-evolving nature of its subject’s story in the real world (he’s still considered a traitor by the US government and forced to live in Russia) – it also manages to seem increasingly relevant in the modern political climate.
Although the 36-page report is classified, officials released a shorter, unclassified version on Thursday a day ahead of Friday’s U.S. premier of an Oliver Stone drama based on the 33-year-old contractor’s exploits.
For all the nuance that Gordon-Levitt and Ifans channel in their performances, there’s precious little of it to be found in the story, which occasionally feels heavy-handed in the way it hammers home a heroic filter on Snowden and his actions.
A dramatization of Snowden’s life from 2004 to now, the well-made film explores what events led to his decision to release top-secret documents about illegal surveillance activities of the National Security Administration (NSA).
Snowden has been charged with violating the United States Espionage Act.
Edward Snowden is an American computer professional, who is a former Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] employee and former contractor of the United States government.
If you think Snowden is a hero, Stone’s film will certainly validate your beliefs.
In its efforts to create a narrative with a beginning, middle, and end, Snowden feels like it takes the easy way around some of the more complicated issues involved in its subject’s actions, and occasionally glosses over some of those issues entirely. He spoke while making an appearance in support of the movie at the Toronto International Film Festival. Gordon-Levitt does an expert job of embodying Snowden in both the preternaturally calm earnest-nerd demeanor we’ve come to know (down to his vocal pitch and patterns) and in those rare private moments that unnerve him and which “Snowden” can uniquely depict as drama. Stone eschews florid style but not his skill at polemical dialogue (although Ifans’ CIA mentor curdles into more or less a stock villain, he’s also allowed to articulate, at length, a legitimate argument in favor of USA espionage strategy).
But he admitted a pardon is not likely to come from Obama, whom he said has kept expanding usa surveillance efforts. Stone’s Snowden gets caught up in a morally fraught Central Intelligence Agency operation, in which he learns how to use the very government surveillance tools he’ll later reveal to the public. “In the hands of the wrong president, it’s very unsafe what we’re doing”.
Even Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who portrays Snowden in this weekend’s flick, wasn’t initially clear who the whistleblower was. “And he’s a very fearless guy”, said Roman, chocolate producer. It is a debate about the future.
‘But as a privacy advocate I think it’s important for me. that there should never be an obligation for an individual to discuss their vote. George Grow was the editor.
Advertisement
“If you want to stop the NSA from spying on you, the best way to do that right now, and perhaps the only way we can do that given the disparity of resources, is through the political process”, Snowden told the crowd on Wednesday night.
