India, however, does not need any dossier because the entire world is aware of Pakistan’s role in promoting terrorism.
Advertisement
“Our actions speak for themselves and you can see our actions are already delivering results”, Swarup said, a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif aggressively raised the Kashmir issue in his speech at the UN General Assembly in NY.
“Pakistan has nothing to gain from such incidents”, he said. ‘The world should first put an end to nuclear activities undertaken by India’.
Further escalating his attack on Pakistan, Singh said Islamabad is the crucible where terrorists are made, adding that 90 percent of radicalisation takes place there.
Prime Minister in a statement rejected these false claims.
Meanwhile, a bill was introduced by two senior legislators in the US Congress seeking to declare Pakistan as a terrorist state.
Nawaz Sharif had in his speech maintained that Pakistan wants peace with India but it is “not possible without resolving the Kashmir issue”.
He glorified Burhan Wani saying, “The young leader murdered by Indian forces has emerged as a symbol of latest Kashmiri Intifada”. On the contrary, Swarup said that everyone talked about terrorism as a growing menace.
The spokesperson said that the request by Baloch leader Brahmdagh Bugti to seek asylum in India “only confirms that India was deeply involved in terrorism in Balochistan”.
In a reference to JeM chief Masood Azhar and Mumbai terror attack mastermind Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, she said terrorist entities and their leaders, including many designated by the United Nations, continue to roam the streets of Pakistan freely and operate with State’s support.
“Similar false promises it has made to us – the global community on terrorism”.
Gambhir called Pakistan a “democracy deficit country” and said the country was extending support to extremist groups, and committing “war crimes” by suppressing minorities and women and denying them basic human rights.
Maintaining the tone set by Indian diplomats at the United Nations in the morning, where Pakistan was described as a “host to the Ivy League of terrorism”, the phrase India chose in the evening was the same: India refers to Pakistan as a state that uses terror as an instrument of the state policy. “Pakistan wants dialogue while holding a terrorist gun in its hand”, he had added.
Advertisement
Sharif had said that Islamabad is open to discuss “all measures of restraint and responsibility” with India, in “any forum or format and without any conditions” but blamed India for posing “unacceptable preconditions” to engage in a dialogue.
