There would be no sitting down to negotiate and pre-emptive military action would be considered. “We are prepared to deal with any kind of the war which the USA wants”, the ruling party organ said.
Advertisement
One, a single strike to halt a missile launch at a launch pad.
While Democrats take a nuclear North Korea seriously, some question the ability to calm the situation as has been global precedent. It would delay the program but not kill it off.
The statement also voiced the council’s concerns over North Korea’s appropriation of its resources for ballistic missile development instead of sustaining its people’s needs. But that requires China to recognise that South Korea’s next president is unlikely to cancel the THAAD deployment, given the threat North Korea poses.
For decades, South Korea and Japan have had a sour relationship.
Right now, there’s no doubt that the greatest threat to world peace in general, and the USA, in particular is coming from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK, commonly referred to as “North Korea”.
The United Nations Security Council has strongly condemned the latest missile launch and tests by North Korea.
The South Korean military has said several times since the September test that Pyongyang was ready to conduct another nuclear blast at any time, and that a tunnel was available at the site to do so.
It goes all the way back to the Nixon administration. Chewing-gum maker and retail giant Lotte Group, South Korea’s No. 5 business group, took the brunt of the backlash after agreeing to let one of its golf courses in southeastern South Korea be a site for deploying the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system, or THAAD. And nobody will be cheering on the North Koreans more than Iran.
And that’s been the case ever since, Lewis argues.
A potential solution to the impasse would be proactive regime change in North Korea, although this seems hard or even impossible to engineer.
Beijing has stepped up its sanctions against North Korea to demonstrate cooperation with the U.S.as the Trump administration increasingly ratchets up rhetoric against Pyongyang, an expert at a think tank closely linked to the Chinese government told The Nikkei. Naturally the Chinese are not pleased with that prospect.
The same applies today to North Korea.
President Donald Trump may soon have to try to cultivate common ground with a new South Korean president whose history illuminates a worldview that, in key respects, stands in opposition to the foundational premises supporting the White House’s nascent North Korea policy. USA aircraft carriers have extensive defensive perimeters and are unlikely to fall prey to enemy attack based on existing capabilities. Recently, however, the USA president has considerably walked back that stance, saying that such an occasion is a long way off. A stronger alignment of US and Japanese strategic goals and a solidification of the US alliance framework including trilateral US-Japan-South Korea defence arrangement are other negative by-products for China.
President Trump tweeted on March 17 “North Korea is behaving very badly”. Needless to say, the WTO process can take over a year to resolve, which is why states ordinarily prefer to settle matters without a going down this route. “China has done little to help!”
Advertisement
“Choe met with Anton Khlopkov, director of Russia’s Center for Energy and Security Studies (CENESS), in Pyongyang on March 15 to exchange opinions on Korean issues”, Radio Free Asia said, citing a source in the Russian Embassy in the North.
