Share

Trade War- US slaps more tariffs on $200b Chinese goods

“It’ll force you to put your oil somewhere else, and it’ll cost you more” to attract more buyers, said Ron Gasser, vice president at Texas-based Mammoth Exploration. “Where we go down the road will be interesting”.

Advertisement

The data came after the administration of US President Donald Trump raised the stakes in its trade dispute with China on Tuesday, saying it would slap 10 per cent tariffs on an extra US$200 billion worth of Chinese imports, including numerous consumer items.

At one large state news organisation, a fourth source said journalists had been instructed to report on Chinese company news with caution because some were already feeling the effects of the trade spat. “Net farm income is less than what it was five years ago”.

The trade fight “is a big risk to the economy, not least because we’re only in the early stages of what could be a significant escalation”, he said.

The website was told to post only stories about the trade conflict by state news agency Xinhua, rather than publishing its own. The United States is fully responsible for the current situation.

“Our country’s steel and aluminum workers are a vital part of the national workforce, and creating jobs in that industry must be a top priority”, Abbott wrote. This suggests the spike in the surplus was a one-off, with analysts expecting a less favourable trade balance for China in coming months as duties on exports start to bite.

Mnuchin pledged the administration wouldn’t pursue measures that would undermine the ability to achieve 3% economic growth. If the U.S. tariffs undermine these promises then it’s not unreasonable to believe that Xi will lose more power.

American food producers, many of which aren’t doing particularly well to begin with, are sounding the alarm over the tariffs.

China’s surplus with the USA hit a record last month, data showed yesterday, adding to brewing tensions between the economic superpowers as they stand on the brink of an all-out trade war that Beijing warned would have a “negative impact” globally.

“I don’t think people understand just how cosmopolitan this state is”, Davis said. Around half of USA propane exports went to Asia in 2017, displacing supplies from Middle Eastern countries and some regional production of propane. Recently, the United States announced tariff change recommendations.

Ginn advocates traditional approaches to resolve imbalances, rather than retaliatory tariffs: working through the World Trade Organization, for example.

On Thursday, prominent economist and former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach told CNBC that Trump appears to be on track to lose in the trade war because the U.S.is hugely dependent on China “for low-priced goods to make ends meet for American consumers”.

Advertisement

European Union voiced its concerns over China’s “potentially distorting effects of public intervention in commercial activities”, behind-the-border measures related to the attribution of licences, insufficient enforcement of intellectual property rights and overcapacity in China’s steel sector. It disrupted the normal global trading order, undermined the free trading system and multilateral trading rules, and violated the law of the market.

Торговая война США набирает обороты