-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Adam Johnson CLEARED of one charge of sexual activity with girl, 15
Footballer Adam Johnson has been found not guilty of one charge of sexual activity with a child.
Advertisement
The jury has yet to reach a verdict over a second count of sexual activity with a child, involving digital penetration, on the same date.
Johnson is alleged to have engaged in a sex act with a 15-year-old girl while the pair were in his parked vehicle during a meeting last January.
But the former Sunderland FC winger denied two further charges of sexual activity with a child that were the subject of the jury’s deliberations.
But the girl told the jury at Bradford Crown Court that the encounter went much further.
The judge started his summary of the case to the jury on Monday and finished yesterday morning before sending the jury out to consider their verdict at 11.55am.
The former footballer was initially arrested at his £1.5m County Durham home on March 2 2015.
“If I wanted to meet her, it was easier to give her my number”, Johnson said.
His girlfriend Stacey Flounders initially vowed to stand by Johnson, but giving evidence during the case, revealed that they had now split up.
The count on which he has been cleared is the one relating to the oral allegation.
Advertisement
Judge Rose had previously told the court that Johnson had told lies during his defense, but that this did not necessarily indicate guilt.