-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Appeals Court Halts Controversial WOTUS Rule
U.S. Rep. Harold “Hal” Rogers (KY-05) released the following statement after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ordered a nationwide stay on a rule drafted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers redefining “Waters of the United States”, also known as WOTUS. The rule, which was jointly proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, was determined by the court to have “ripple effects” that determined the best course of action was to maintain the status quo for the time being. ASA President Wade Cowan, a soybean farmer from Brownfield, Texas, commended the court for its decision and called on EPA to pull the rule and commit to working with farmers on more practical ways to meet the nation’s water quality goals.
Advertisement
“The WOTUS rule is vague and fails to let regulated parties know when their conduct violates the law”, Prestage said.
“But court battles take months, if not years – and come at a considerable cost”. Judges David W. McKeague and Richard Allen Griffin – both appointed by Republican President George W. Bush – said delaying implementation nationwide “temporarily silences the whirlwind of confusion that springs from uncertainty about the requirements of the new rule and whether they will survive legal testing”. Although he did not present oral arguments during the Sixth Circuit augments, Morrisey said that he has made oral arguments against the rule in other federal appellate courts. “This court’s decision is a step in the right direction, and I’ll continue to fight for legislation that reverses this rule and restores a few sanity to the permitting process in this country”.
Currently, the EPA’s oversight applies to all navigable waters.
Advertisement
The order, issued on a 2-1 vote from the Cincinnati-based Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, was a preliminary boost for a group of 18 states that challenged the EPA regulation. The EPA contends Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 left 60 percent of the nation’s streams and millions of acres of wetlands without clear federal protection. Previously this power only applied to “navigable waters” like rivers and lakes.