-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) In Litigation For Pseudonym ‘iWatch’ Ownership
Basically the term iWatch is now so entrenched with the Apple Watch that no one else would think about Probendi’s own product, even though the company has not stated what the iWatch is or what it does, only that they own the trademark.
Advertisement
As it turns out, a development studio named Probendi in Ireland has held the trademark for the iWatch moniker since 2008.
Generally, customers tend to call the watch from Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) as iWatch (a name inspired by the iPhone), and punch same term in the search bar on Google.
This is because Apple doesn’t want to miss out on potential customers, but the company who owns the iWatch trademark in Europe has now seen an opportunity to make some cash, and it looks like a lengthy court battle could follow. Apple and Google declined to comment on the case.
As Bloomberg noted in a Tuesday (July 14) article, Internet searches using “iWatch” as a key term will spur Google’s search engine to return ads for the Apple Watch.
The hearing for the iWatch case is scheduled for November 11, 2015.
On June 26, Ireland-based software and networking service company Probendi sued Apple Inc.
Daniele Di Salvo, CEO and co-founder of Probendi, suggests that its iWatch software helps devices communicate with each other. In part that’s tied to the fact that the smaller firm is working on a smart watch that would be price competitive with Apple, run on Google’s Android platform and be known as the iWatch. But, as of now, the project is “in standby”, said Di Salvo.
Giacomo Bonelli, a lawyer for Probendi said that both the firms facing allegations refused to comment. According to the unnamed sources (so requested because the review remains confidential), that audit valued the iWatch trademark at $97 million.
Advertisement
In 2012, Apple settled a naming row in China over its right to use the name iPad.