-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Apple Maybe Interested in Buying Time Warner
Time Warner hasn’t committed to stepping up onto the auction block, but pressure is mounting for the company to do something because its value for shareholders is declining.
Advertisement
According to a New York Post report (via MacRumors): “Eddy Cue, one of Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook’s top lieutenants, in charge of content deals, has been keeping tabs on proceedings at Time Warner, a source close to Apple said”. These include the crown-jewel premium network HBO, the CNN news network, TBS and TNT, which have some sports contracts, and the Warner Bros. studio.
Time Warner shares closed at $71.06 yesterday, which is far below the $85 per share offer 21st Century Fox made and had rejected 18 months ago. Apple doesn’t do deals this large-its biggest previous was Beats Electronics in 2014, for $3 billion-but there’s a first time for everything.
The Post report said Apple would be interested in Time Warner’s assets to support the launch of a stand-alone streaming TV service. He noted that HBO content is already available on Apple TV, but, if Apple itself owned and controlled the content, it “could throw everything from Veep to Game of Thrones into its bundle for free”. There is too much included in the package that is Time Warner that Apple doesn’t need. “HBO looks set to thrive in a cord-cutting world; Time Warner’s cable networks are more likely to struggle”, the article said.
Advertisement
That would be less expensive than today’s cable offerings, which offer hundreds of channels that many subscribers don’t watch. Even HBO alone would be a huge feather in Apple’s cap. Apple likes to make small tuck-in acquisitions of companies with interesting technologies or talented engineers.