The United Nations previously imposed sanctions on North Korea for three tests it carried out in 2006, 2009 and 2013.
Advertisement
President Obama called the test destabilizing and provocative.
A recent episode of the snappily named “The stage of optimism that Songun presented – Volume 11”, which airs on state-controlled Korea Central Television (KCTV), lampooned the U.S. leader and “oppressed” South Koreans ahead of the North’s nuclear warhead test this month.
The South Korean leader said the DPRK’s fifth nuclear test was conducted during her series of trips to China, Russia and Laos where Park said she confirmed the global community’s unified determination not to accept the DPRK as a nuclear state.
Nearly as fast came calls for additional sanctions on the North. “Our arsenal is a countermeasure against threats and sanctions from hostile forces, including the United States”.
Six-nation diplomatic talks aimed at ridding the North of its bombs have been stalled since the last round of meetings in late 2008.
“It’s the same response every time. I think that you couldn’t necessarily rule that possibility out”, says Snyder.
“We also believe that sanction is neither an end nor the only approach. What are their unintended consequences and how they might be improved”, Walsh explains.
On September 13, South Korean Defence Ministry spokesman, Moon Sang-gyun, said that North Korea is ready to conduct an additional nuclear test at any time. This means that internal North Korean decision-making on nuclear use would be unchecked and would ultimately depend on a single individual, Kim Jong-un, compounding the risks and dangers of living with North Korea with a survivable nuclear deterrent and direct strike capability on the United States. USA analysts argue China supports the North to preserve a buffer state that keeps U.S. forces from its border. Pressure for further sanctions was “laughable”, North Korea has said, vowing to continue to strengthen its nuclear power. While there, they work with a network of private Chinese companies to procure arms.
“The most interesting case really is China because of the extent of trade”.
But threatening World War 3 rhetoric has been used by North Korea before on several occasions. In fact, it exaggerated the external threat and createed domestic conditions, which are favourable for the development of nuclear weapons. “So it’s not going to cut off oil or coal or iron or something that threatens directly the survivability of the government”, Walsh says. During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s National Defense Committee immediately after North Korea’s fifth nuclear test on Sep.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the Obama administration’s policy of “strategic patience” with respect to North Korea has come in for a lot of criticism from experts across the board.
