Share

Climate deal needs legally binding periodic reviews, says Obama

“We still need a Paris agreement”, Obama said.

Advertisement

“If we have these periodic reviews built in, what I believe will happen is that, by sending that signal to researchers and scientists and investors and entrepreneurs, and venture funds, we’ll actually start hitting these targets faster than we expected”.

According to the Senate committee document, the administration can’t enforce any agreements from the summit – even though Obama said exactly the opposite on Tuesday, declaring portions of the global warming deal being hammered out in Paris should be legally binding on the countries that sign on.

Mr Obama said rising seas and warming climates could be a drain on economic resources. “I’m confident of the wisdom of the American people on that front”.

President Barack Obama asked fellow world leaders to leave a legally-binding legacy.

“Tackling climate change is a shared mission for mankind”, Xi said, urging negotiators to establish “an equitable and effective global mechanism on climate change”.

Now, deprived of the “U.S. can’t act alone” argument, the opponents have taken a new tack: It’s insane to focus on the long-term threat from climate change when we should be concentrating on the more immediate threat from radical Islamic terrorism. Everybody else is taking climate change really seriously.

Meanwhile, amid the talks near Paris, the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives was directly challenging President Obama’s environmental policies, scheduling votes on Tuesday afternoon that would strike down rules on reducing carbon emissions from power plants, both current and future.

French President François Hollande watches a man who cycles to produce electricity during the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris.

Obama in his remarks touted his November 2014 pledge to cut USA emissions 26 percent to 28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025 and said the nation is on track to meet its 2009 pledge to curb emissions 17 percent from the same 2005 baseline by 2020 (219 DEN A-8, 11/13/14).

Negotiators have produced a new draft of a climate agreement that’s supposed to set the world on a path toward cleaner energy and reduce the carbon pollution blamed for global warming.

While condemning the shooting, Obama also criticized some of “rhetoric” surrounding Planned Parenthood and abortion. They are the largest producers of greenhouse gases.

She said “there was doubt before” about the US position.

McConnell raised the possibility of a Republican successor to Obama tearing up the power plant plan, claiming that the regulations “could result in the elimination of as many as a quarter of a million United States jobs” without any significant impact upon world temperatures. Canada dumped it, too, and China, India and other developing countries were exempt from it.

Regardless of the specific agreements that emerge during the next two weeks, the Paris talks represent an example of the civilized world pulling together to fight a common threat to humanity.

Climate diplomacy touches the live wire of national interests, among users and sellers of fossil fuels, especially among countries keen to use cheap and plentiful energy to power their growth.

Advertisement

Envoys at the Paris climate conference say governments and companies need to do more to protect forests, which can help slow global warming.

Climate protesters in Rome demonstrate while negotiators discuss what to do about global warming in Paris this week