-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Companies crucial to energy exploration abandon $34B merger
The Justice Department “has reached the wrong conclusion in its assessment of the transaction and that its action is counterproductive, especially in the context of the challenges the US and global energy industry are facing”, the companies said in a joint statement.
Advertisement
The contract governing Halliburton’s acquisition of Baker Hughes, which was valued at $35B when first announced in November 2014, expired on Saturday without an agreement by the companies to extend it.
The companies had set a deadline for the end of April to complete the deal or walk away.
Halliburton will pay Baker Hughes a termination fee of $3.5 billion by Wednesday, according to the statement.
The demise of the merger could not be independently confirmed Sunday night.
The collapse of Halliburton’s acquisition of Baker Hughes comes as both companies struggle to cope with the impact of lower energy prices on their clients. Halliburton’s first-quarter revenue fell 17% to $4.2 billion, compared with the same period a year earlier.
The glut slowed demand for drilling services and crushed the stock price of both companies.
Shares of Halliburton and Baker Hughes have declined amid the worst oil slump in a generation, reducing the deal’s value from $34.6bn when it was announced.
Halliburton and Baker Hughes had called their deal “pro-competitive” after it came under attack from the Justice Department, noting that Halliburton had offered to sell off billions of dollar in assets.
Advertisement
The department said in the lawsuit that a Halliburton-Baker Hughes merger “threatens to substantially lessen competition in numerous markets”.