The Paris Agreement preamble (which is not binding) includes a goal of developed countries funding a $100 billion transitional fund to help developing countries become developed without a heavy reliance on cheap fossil fuels.
Advertisement
“India has been a strong advocate of the principle of differentiation and operationalisation of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR)…” The Paris Agreement, in process and outcome, is a dramatic improvement – a product of the growing urgency to act on the defining issue of our time. He also pointed out that the principle of differentiation has been maintained in the Agreement.
Throughout the course of the negotiations, India engaged constructively and in good faith, he said, adding that the path-breaking alliance will provide an “unprecedented” boost to solar energy development. But CSE analyses say India will be under constant pressure to take more burden for mitigating climate change by 2020 and beyond, especially when the next review of all the nationally determined contributions of countries take place.
Javadekar said the concepts of climate justice and sustainable lifestyle put forward by Prime Minister Narendra Modi have been included in the Paris agreement.
“If it delivers that, it truly will be world changing”.
To erase any notion of historical responsibility, the developed countries had gone to the extent of mentioning in the text that the loss and damage due to climate change “do not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation”, Bhushan added.
“Non-state actor leadership is key to the success of COP21 and to the effective transition to a low-emissions and climate-resilient future”, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, president of COP21, said. “This is why I strongly encourage you to take bold actions and make ambitious commitments, both individually and collectively, register them on NAZCA, and sign on to the Paris Pledge for Action, to make sure the commitments made in Paris by governments are achieved or evenexceeded”.
“The agreement is based on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)”. The issue of which provisions to make legally binding (expressed as “shall” as opposed to “should”) was a central concern for many countries, in particular the United States, which wanted an agreement the president could accept without seeking congressional approval. While the overall agreement is legally binding, some of its elements – including individual states’ pledges to curb emissions as well as certain climate finance elements – are not. Here the financial relationship between developed and developing countries as it relates to greenhouse gas emissions is discussed.
Advertisement
Responding to calls from citizens countrywide, our delegation returned to a more co-operative approach, advocating for inclusion of human rights and indigenous knowledge, along with recognition of the critical importance of the 1.5 C goal.
