The study looked at over 100,000 women diagnosed with DCIS between 1988 and 2011 and assessed how many had died of breast cancer 10 and 20 years after the diagnosis. “These women are not dying of DCIS”. But Brawley, who was not involved in the study, also said he had no doubt that treatment had been excessive.
Advertisement
Esserman stated that if lethal breast cancers began out as DCIS, the incidence of invasive breast cancers ought to have plummeted with rising detection charges. Cancer treatments, especially invasive surgical procedures, come with their own risks and side effects. Some women with DCIS experience a second breast cancer (DCIS or invasive) and a small proportion of patients with DCIS ultimately die of breast cancer. DCIS is considered “stage zero”, but the oncology community has not reached consensus on what exactly DCIS is, and whether it should be considered a cancer, a precursor to cancer, or simply a risk factor.
However some ladies who died of breast most cancers ended up with the illness all through their physique with out ever having it recur of their breast – many, the truth is, had no breast as a result of that they had had a mastectomy.
Some physician commented that they would not change their clinical practice based on the study.
“I do think that this will launch a discussion at the scientific level. So the more certainty we can have as patients, the more comfortable we’re going to be”, said Mary Lou Smith, 60, from Chicago.
“Whilst we have seen a fall in the number of people drinking heavily on a regular basis, drinking even small amounts of alcohol regularly can increase the risks of some health conditions”. The risks were higher for black women and women who were diagnosed before the age of 35 (the mean age in the study was 53.8). Hawley said that with further research, more targeted treatments might be possible for women who are at higher risk. It takes its toll on us.
That type of approach can meet resistance from patients. Karuna Jaggar, executive director of Breast Cancer Action, an education and activist organization, said women tended not to appreciate the harms of overtreatment and often overestimated their risk of dying of cancer, making them react with terror. “Compared to women who really have cancer, it is nothing”.
That’s a complete shift in thinking about DCIS.
After three surgeries failed to fully eradicate her DCIS in 2010, Donna Pinto of Rancho Peñasquitos went online and found studies that indicated the disease might never spread. It was, she said, a wonderful read. And this study says that’s just simply not true.
Pinto has not kept her diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions to herself. Should DCIS be called cancer at all? That may lead some women to skip radiation, Narod said. Are you saying something different should be done, that women should wait if they have a very early-stage breast cancer?
The other thing I say is that, although death was the primary end point of this story, for many women, recurrence in the breast, even if it’s not associated with death, is a psychologically devastating complication that they would like to seek additional treatment to avoid.
Evidence also suggests, for example, that previous blanket prohibition of soy protein for breast cancer patients may not be warranted.
Advertisement
Death rates 20 years after diagnosis totaled about 3 percent for women whose breast cancer was confined to a milk duct.
