7 said Canada and Mexico could impose $1.01 billion per year in retaliatory tariffs over the USA country-of-origin labeling program for beef and pork if it stays in place, and Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., called for repeal of the program.
Advertisement
Las Vegas debate doesn’t scramble GOP field
He agreed to a framework that would have granted provisional legalization without insisting on security improvements first. And eventually they’ll succeed. “He strongly supported legalizing people that were in this country illegally”.
The World Trade Organization ruled Monday that Canada and Mexico can impose more than $1 billion in tariffs on US goods in retaliation for meat labeling rules it says discriminates against Mexican and Canadian livestock. “It also disrupts the highly integrated North American meat industry supply chain”, the Canadian government said in a statement after the WTO ruling.
HISD warns parents, students of threat of violence
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said he would not second-guess the decisions made in Los Angeles or { New York New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said: “It’s important – very important – not to overreact in situations like this”.
The dispute dates back for years, but the WTO decided this year that mandatory COOL violated global trade rules, because it disadvantaged companies importing meat and livestock into the US.
CBI working to ‘finish” those who don’t fall in line: Arvind Kejriwal
AAP spokesperson Ashutosh lashed out at Jaitley, asking why contracts were given to “front companies of DDCA office-bearers”. In response, Jaitley had said on Thursday, “I left cricket administration in 2013”.
US industry groups were successful in the House in June in getting the meat labeling repealed, but the Senate has yet to act despite dire warnings from the industry groups.
Canada has already announced a comprehensive list of products it intends to retaliate against, including not only USA beef and pork but grains, fruits and manufactured goods, NCBA’s Ellis said.
The Canadian Cattlemen’s Association, the Canadian Pork Council, the National Feeders’ Association and Canadian Meat Council added their collective voices to the call on the U.S.to scrap the labelling provisions in light of the decision.
It is not yet clear what products Canada or Mexico could target for retaliatory tariffs, but they could include products outside the agricultural sector.
Prior to the decision, Capitol Hill sources told Agri-Pulse that COOL repeal in the Senate is a likely outcome, but the size of the retaliatory figure would be a factor. That law was challenged by Canada and Mexico, who ultimately persuaded the WTO that the law accorded unfavorable treatment to Canadian and Mexican livestock because, amongst other things, it required segregation of live animals.
“This means retaliation is now a reality”, Ms. Freeland said in an interview. In the face of Canadian tariffs and the WTO ruling, that may soon change.
Canadian Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay, whose Liberal party took power from the Conservatives in October, said last month that Canada would retaliate if necessary.
The WTO decision Monday is the latest development in a dispute over US mandates that food contain country-of-origin labels, a measure known by the acronym COOL.
Advertisement
“We have had literally years to fix this problem and have not done so, and now we face a billion dollar penalty”, he said.
