Share

Judge to rule soon on Tom Brady’s suspension

U.S. District Judge Richard Berman indicated on Monday, after declaring no settlement had been reached between Brady and the NFL, that he might have a decision as early as Tuesday.

Advertisement

The league upheld Brady’s suspension July 28 in a 20-page decision that stated Brady “participated in a scheme to tamper” with the game balls in the AFC title game, based on the evidence collected by Wells.

“What [the NFL is] saying, is that even if it happened”, he continued, referencing Tom Brady’s specific instruction to Patriots equipment managers to inflate footballs to illegal levels.

“We want to thank the court”, said Feely, a free-agent kicker and a member of the NFL Players Association’s executive committee. He previously had said he would try to make his ruling by Friday, six days before the New England Patriots’ first regular-season game, which is against the Pittsburgh Steelers at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, on Thursday, September 10.

UCLA cornerback Ishmael Adams, who has started 26 consecutive games, was arrested on suspicion of taking a phone from an Uber driver. The courtroom session lasted roughly 20 minutes.

Brady has denied any wrongdoing, but was nonetheless suspended for the first four games of the 2015 season by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.

“It’s been such an enjoyable offseason”, Brady said sarcastically when former Patriots backup quarterback Scott Zolak, the event’s emcee, asked him to name “the coolest thing they did” after the Super Bowl, via Giardi. Both sides in the case had said they wanted a decision made in time for the contest.

Brady is expected to appeal any suspension through a court injunction through the second circuit.

“I think it’s nuts”, Rosenberg said about the skewering of her work in the Twitterverse.

In coming to Brady’s defense, the union wants to push back at what it views as Goodell’s aggressive interpretation of his powers.

The judge has also been mostly critical of the league during the hearings, citing weaknesses in the way the NFL handled the controversy and suggested that the league’s finding was too vague, that Brady was generally aware that game balls were being deflated.

Advertisement

It only takes a binge of “Law and Order” to know that if precedent has been set in a case, then precedent needs to be followed.

Phil Sears-USA TODAY Sports