The Department of Justice filed the lawsuit a few days after the City Council voted on the drafted agreement.
Advertisement
The attempt to remove the so-called “poison pill” clause, was either foolish or deceitful, he said. Ferguson’s own lawyer has said that fighting a suit will probably cost millions of dollars, well more than the city has budgeted. He added, “There’s no point in agreeing to something we can’t afford”.
St. Louis County police spokesman Brian Schellman said if the county were ever asked to take over policing in Ferguson, “we would consider the implications of the consent decree before entering into such an agreement”. “They’ve chosen to live in the past”.
The report was also critical of a profit-driven municipal court that made money at the expense of mostly poor and minority residents. For municipal offenses where Ferguson police officers have a high degree of discretion in charging, African Americans were again disproportionately represented as compared to their relative representation in Ferguson. The consent decree was meant to address problems with the city’s police department and municipal court detailed after an extensive investigation a year ago. She now plans to visit six USA cities, focusing first on Miami to spotlight local police departments that are “building trust and legitimacy” in their communities.
It was an expensive deal.
Meanwhile, Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder said in a statement that Ferguson leaders “are making a good-faith effort to adopt reforms to correct past problems”.
The Justice Department’s reaction was swift.
But at the public hearings on the decree, residents were divided. Council members and some residents said they could not afford the cost, which could have required a tax increase. It also said it wanted more time to comply with the other terms. The cities deny the charges, and have countered that federal officials targeted them because they don’t approve of their religion.
Key changes approved by the city would drop a requirement for police pay raises, and include a stipulation that if another agency takes over police or other duties in the future, it would not be subject to the provisions of the settlement. As a result, the DOJ is filing a civil rights lawsuit against Ferguson. They have waited decades for justice.
“We hope the DOJ is willing to sit down and talk to us and continue negotiations”, Councilman Wesley Bell said.
After being surprised by proposed last minute amendments to a reform deal, the Justice Department began legal proceedings on Wednesday to sue the city.
The council voted unanimously Tuesday night to amend the proposed settlement the city spent seven months negotiating with the DOJ. “If you can’t put measures into place so you operate under the Constitution of the United States and guarantee rights to the citizens of the area, the city needs to dissolve”. “They should not be forced to wait any longer”, Lynch told a Washington news conference.
The department is also now arguing a case against Colorado City, Ariz. and Hildale, Utah.
But only two departments – Columbus, Ohio and Alamance County, N.C. – have managed to take on the Justice Department in court and get away without a reform agreement.
Ferguson is among 90 municipalities in sprawling St. Louis County. But a working draft from April 2015 obtained by the Miami Herald showed the settlement would run just three years from start to finish. The city faced a $2.8 million deficit this year.
“The assessment is, as the agreement now stands, it will cost more to implement the agreement than it would be to fight it in a lawsuit”, Knowles said Wednesday.
While the expense and risk are greater for Ferguson, both sides have an interest in keeping the matter out of court. “Do I not have the right to record?” the civilian asked. The report they issued the following spring with their findings was nothing short of shocking, and confirmed the sentiments of many blacks in this country when it comes to how they are treated by law enforcement agencies.
Federal officials allege that Ferguson police violated the Fourth Amendment by stopping people without reasonable suspicion, arresting them without cause and using unreasonable force against them. “But it will be an economic defeat for the people of Ferguson”.
He said the city council voted 6-0 to adopt the agreement, but with seven amendments that were installed after the analysis revealed the costs could lead to the dissolution of Ferguson.
Advertisement
Rushin said that federal officials seem to have a stronger case in Ferguson.
