In February, the social media platform announced its “Trust and Safety Committee”.
Advertisement
Media commentator Dan Gillmor, who teaches digital media literacy at Arizona State University, observed the limitations of the free-speech arguments when it comes to commercial enterprises like Twitter or Facebook.
Conservatives knew that the Twitter panel, comprised of left-leaning organizations, would target the right. Twitter confirmed the authenticity of the notice.
“Following the suspension, users started to tweet with the “#FreeMilo” hashtag. Likewise Twitter won’t stipulate which Tweets were the reason Yiannopouolos had to go on Tuesday. As a result, Jones was inundated with racist tweets that proved so demeaning that Jones chose to take a break from the social media app altogether.
In 2014, the company partnered with Women, Action & the Media, a US -based non-profit organization, in an attempt to deal with bullying and harassment. They give lip service to transparency, then hide behind their platforms and their doublespeak.
Referring to Mr Yiannopoulos’s case, he says that Twitter is within its rights to ban his account.
Following reports that the actress was forced to leave Twitter over racist abuse which actually sprang from a war of words between herself and a tech editor for news site, Breitbart, Twitter, has responded by banning Milo. Last month, I investigated atheist and pro-LGBT teenagers in Muslim countries who were being reported to their respective governments’ Twitter accounts for blasphemy because of past tweets. He added that he was not responsible for other people’s tweets. That’s a reasonable standard as long as it is applied fairly, or at least fairly most of the time.
Yiannopoulos called the move “cowardly”, saying he was targeted for being a gay conservative.
All of these efforts ignore the guts of the problem: The company is built upon a foundation of people yelling at one another to get more attention. A shameless self-promoter, he flogs their intolerance, because, well, they are extremely intolerant. While individuals may try access Twitter from a different location, these bans are still a significant improvement. Note that Twitter did not exile Yiannapoulos for anything he wrote, but for what his fans wrote.
“Twitter has suspended me without evidence of wrongdoing and without explanation while allowing the most appalling abuses to continue on its platform”, he told Breitbart. He also was accused of sharing racist tweets from an account purported to belong to Jones, according to screenshots in news articles.
Many users, once again, were forced to ask whether this has become a defining and inescapable feature of a once-fun platform that now for many people, especially women and people of colour, can at any time become a threatening cesspool. I don’t defend those remarks.
Twitter has been criticized for not taking sufficient measures to control abusive behavior on their site.
We all know that won’t happen.
Advertisement
In addition to a public statement, Twitter contacted Milo by email to inform him of the ban. It’s easy to tout civil discourse when you’ve muzzled your opponents. Yiannopoulos had over 350,000 followers before his account @Nero was suspended. “Twitter provides blocking functions but, in the end, it is impossible to escape the abuse if it is rampant”.
