-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Losing the Grammar Race: Trump Backers
A new “study” done by the grammar app Grammarly examined the Facebook comments of the supporters of all major Presidential candidates and noticed a few startling patterns.
Advertisement
According to the Washington Post, the company explained their results in a detailed blog post. Trump supporters, of which there are about 433x as many on Facebook alone, make over 4x the errors in every 100 words of commenting (as Chafee’s minions). Trump supporters are far more numerous but most grammatically challenged, racking up 12.6 boo-boos per hundred words.
Coming up in the rankings right behind Trump were fellow Republicans Rick Santorum with 11.5 grammar errors per 100 words and Marco Rubio with 8.8 mistakes per 100 words. Democrats also averaged almost ten more words per comment: 41.8 compared to 32.4 for Republicans.
The five Facebook pages with the least grammatical errors belong to the Democratic candidates. Supports of Republican Carly Fiorina and Democrat Hillary Clinton tied in the middle with 6.3 mistakes per 100 words. Next, we created a set of guidelines to help limit (as much as possible) the subjectivity of categorizing the comments as positive or negative.
It ran all of the comments through its automated proofreader and had a team of humans on hand to verify and tally the errors. They then selected 180 random comments for each candidate.
Advertisement
They then focused in on “black-and-white mistakes such as misspellings, wrong and missing punctuation, misused or missing words, and subject-verb disagreement” while ignoring “stylistic variations such as the use of common slang words, serial comma usage, and the use of numerals instead of spelled-out numbers”.