-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Missouri House proposes expanding A+ Scholarship for college
But adjournment looms next Friday, and Republican Senate leadership had already demonstrated that they are willing to use parliamentary maneuvers to quash a filibuster and force a vote without any concessions to Democrats. If the state does not budget money for that, election authorities would be barred from enforcing it.
Advertisement
“It very much gives me ugly reminders of the Jim Crow day”, said Springfield NAACP President Cheryl Clay.
It quickly became the most contentious issue of the 2016 session.
“It’s not only poor African-Americans, it’s poor people in general across our cities”, Clay said.
To address that, this year’s legislation directs the state to pay for one birth certificate or other document necessary for someone to get an ID. Will Kraus, R-Lee’s Summit.
Missouri Republicans have sought to establish a photo ID requirement to vote for a decade.
“This is nowhere near where I would want it”, said Kraus, who is also running for Missouri secretary of state. Religious leaders said its protections were desperately needed.
“If someone finds out that their neighbor is not voting for whatever reason and grabs their utility bill, they can go down and vote for their neighbor”, Kraus said.
In 2006, Republicans pushed through a photo ID bill that was later struck down by the Missouri Supreme Court.
Younger voters and African-Americans were impacted most by the change. She said she was surprised and disappointed that she didn’t have a chance to weigh in. Jason Holsman said. “This substitute (legislation) will disenfranchise less voters than when we started”, he said, adding that he still opposes the bill.
State Sen. Kiki Curls, a Democrat, shares that concern but said that with only eight Democrats in the 34-member Senate, the compromise was the best outcome this year. If passed by the Senate, because the bill language has changed, the House and Senate would have to come to a resolution before the proposal moves forward.
Advertisement
To go into effect, voters would also have to approve a constitutional amendment requiring ID at the polls.