Harrison, who proposed to meet with league investigators August 30, couldn’t help himself when discussing the league’s dangling of potential discipline for failing to cooperate with an investigation into alleged performance-enhancing drug use.
Advertisement
Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrisonhasagreed to meet with NFL investigators as demanded by the league, which threatened suspension if the players fail to do so regarding steroid allegations stemming from an Al-Jazeera report in January. But the obvious animosity between the NFL and the NFLPA due to the past behavior and poor track record of Goodell and the league office feeds the desire of the players to fight back.
“Neither the CBA nor the policy state that a player must agree to an in-person interview based upon random, baseless verbal remarks or face discipline for a failure to cooperate with a league investigation”, union attorney Heather McPhee wrote in July on Harrison’s behalf. The league had warned the players in a letter they would be suspended by August 26 if they did not agree to meet with investigators.
“Like I said before, I don’t have a problem with doing an interview”, Harrison said.
“Whatever evidence they think they may have or reason for questioning me, it’s out of my control, I really don’t know”, he said.
“I never had a bully before in my life and I’m DAMN sure not about to have one at this point”, Harrison posted on his Instagram account. “You can ask me about PEDs”. Birch also said the league determined that an assertion made in Neal’s affidavit was “demonstrably false”. “I don’t see why we couldn’t have the media there [at the interview], do it live”.
NFL Players Association attorney Heather McPhee sent a letter to the NFL on Thursday, accusing it of trying to “bully and publicly shame” Harrison without offering evidence beyond a brief mention in television interview past year that was recanted by the accuser.
Harrison, who has spent all but one of his 13 seasons with the Steelers, had one of the most memorable plays in Super Bowl history, returning an interception 100 yards for a touchdown on the final play of the half in Super Bowl XLII.
The union does not represent Manning any longer, but National Football League officials said Manning and Ashley, his wife, had been cooperative in the investigation and both provided interviews as well as access to the records investigators had sought.
Matthews said there was nothing more that he could tell the league than that the report about him is untrue. The players up until this point had maintained their innocence and refused to submit to interviews with the league and commissioner Roger Goodell.
Instead, the NFLPA argues, Harrison’s case falls under the performance-enhancing substance policy, which makes no mention of media reports as “credible evidence” warranting an investigation.
Advertisement
There were a lot of storylines that came out of the Chiefs first preseason game of the year.
