The judge’s order said UNC must accommodate students and employees on a case-by-case basis, unlike the blanket rule created by HB2.
Advertisement
US District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder said three plaintiffs challenging the measure were likely to succeed at trial on their claim that it violates the 1972 Title IX Act, which prohibits sex-based discrimination by schools receiving federal funding. North Carolina in March became the first USA state to bar people from using restrooms in government buildings and public schools consistent with their gender identity.
“Ultimately, the record reflects what counsel for Governor [Pat] McCrory candidly speculates was the status quo ante in North Carolina in recent years: some transgender individuals have been quietly using bathrooms and other facilities that match their gender identity, without public awareness or incident”.
Much of the legal showdown hinges on whether the DOJ can argue that North Carolina has violated federal law by refusing to accept current, widely held medical standards – that gender identity is separate from biological sex.
The victory is a partial one, however, as it only applies to the North Carolina university system.
One transgender rights organisation welcomed the ruling which affects but does not strike down what it called “a unsafe and bigoted law”.
‘Today, the tightness that I have felt in my chest every day since HB2 passed has eased. Yet Schroeder does not cite this standard at all-and if he had, I suspect he would have struggled to articulate North Carolina’s “exceedingly persuasive justification” for excluding trans people from government bathrooms.
Schroeder’s 81-page ruling is based on a limited record of evidence – expected to grow immensely in the months before the trial scheduled for November – and on a ruling in a Virginia teen’s case from an appeals court with jurisdiction over North Carolina.
However, he said plaintiffs haven’t shown they are likely to succeed on a claim that the law violates their constitutional equal protection rights, and he reserved judgment on another constitutional claim related to due process.
“North Carolina’s peeping and indecent exposure statutes continue to protect the privacy of citizens regardless of [the bathroom provision]”, he wrote.
Keisling concluded: “The court’s logic applies equally to all public schools and other places where HB2 conflicts with federal civil rights laws”.
Several groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal, celebrated Friday’s ruling. Defending the law are Republican Gov.
Advertisement
“We’re confident justice will prevail in the larger case … so that all gay and transgender North Carolinians will be free from the harm of H.B”. In a statement responding to Judge Schroeder’s injunction, North Carolina Senate leader Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore defended H.B. That’s very odd, and it will also likely be altered at the 4 Circuit, which should halt HB2’s enforcement against every university student and employee.
