“This is a very unsafe deal, and it threatens all of us“, Netanyahu said. Liberals tend to have a more balanced view with many Israeli defense experts being in favor of it. It’s this that makes it so hard for us ordinary folk to form an unbiased opinion. “This agreement could change the realities in our region, but also globally”.
Advertisement
Among them, he named technical information, business and science.
Shortly after the Netanyahu webcast, Mr Obama met more than 20 leaders of US Jewish organisations in the White House. From Iran’s perspective, America is the “Great Satan” and we are the “Little Satan”.
David said negotiations set out to create a dismantle-for-dismantle agreement. After the failure of the 2004 Paris Agreement, Iran was defiant; it refused to negotiate seriously, it was uncooperative with worldwide weapons inspectors, and it vowed never to cave to pressure and dismantle its nuclear production, which increased dramatically during the Bush years.
While the agreement was well-intended, David said, it missed the mark. “Ultimately it is very clear, one way or another, Iran’s military nuclear programme must be stopped”, Yaalon said. He has defeated the FDA in federal court a remarkable eight times, seven on First Amendment grounds, and is the author of the Amazon bestsellers The Rise of Tyranny, Global Censorship of Health Information, and Restore the Republic.
Only Kapo scum like you would support Obama’s nuke deal for political benefit over the security of Israel AND the US. If Iran does not keep its promises, the agreement will be voided. New York restaurants, observed Jackie Mason, get more intrusive inspections than the Iranian nuclear program. But David called the plan “Swiss cheese”. At the moment that she said this, the ambassadors from Britain, France, and Germany were urging 30 members of Congress to support the Iran deal, saying that rejection would trigger a “nightmare” and a “catastrophe”-thus sending a signal that they were fine with American leadership as is. There are too many loopholes”.
Should Congress vote against the deal, the United States might lose out while the five other big-power signatories re-engage with Iran, including in lucrative trade deals.
In short, the paradoxical logic of nuclear deterrence – the concept of MAD, or Mutually Assured Destruction – that kept the nuclear peace for the duration of the Cold War is sadly inapplicable to the Middle East today and for the foreseeable future. On Wednesday, the group pushed back forcefully on the president’s characterization of its campaign of opposition to the deal.
It’s no secret that Netanyahu wanted to prevent Rivlin from becoming president; he was even prepared to extend Peres’ term of office, at least for a year, but the Knesset overruled him. “They want to spread Islam according to their interpretation of Islam”.
President Barack Obama’s speech at American University was a thorough enough review of the issues that have come to surround the agreement to restrict Iran’s nuclear program that any fair-minded listener who focuses on merits rather than politics would reach the conclusion, as Mr. Obama has, that completion of this agreement as being in U.S. interests was not a hard decision or even close to being one.
Advertisement
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, another leading Republican presidential candidate, said, “We are leading from behind under the Obama-Clinton doctrine”. “We’re not walking to the ovens”.
