-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Oscar Pistorius Parole Hearing Postponed: Latest Details and Comments
The board had convened at a correctional centre in Durban on Friday to reconsider, among other things, Pistorius’s placement on parole.
Advertisement
The hearing into the legality of the Paralympian Oscar Pistorius’s probation has been postponed for two weeks.
The delay was because the board had been unable to finalize all its cases on Friday, when it had been due to meet to decide if Pistorius should be freed on parole or serve a longer period in jail, local television station ENCA reported.
He was sentenced to five years in prison last October.
Pistorius is now being held in the hospital wing at the Kgosi Mampuru II prison in central Pretoria but if he is released, he is likely to serve to remainder of his sentence under house arrest at his uncle’s mansion home.
Pistorius is having a five-year paragraph for murder his lover Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine’s Day couple of years ago.
Pistorius’ case was among those that must still be reviewed. However, South Africa’s justice minister intervened and ordered a review, saying that decision had been made prematurely.
Justice Minister Michael Mashuta’s spokesperson, Mthunzi Mhaga, could not be reached for comment.
Pistorius’ lawyer Barry Roux has said that the former Paralympic athlete’s “financial ability” to pay for another trial would be “non-existent” following the the amount of money he spent on the initial trial.
State prosecutors appealed Judge Thokozile Masipa’s judgment, saying she had misinterpreted the law when she ruled Pistorius did not intentionally shoot Steenkamp.
Advertisement
Whatever the outcome of the parole decision, the Supreme Court of Appeal will hear the prosecution’s appeal in November.