-
Tips for becoming a good boxer - November 6, 2020
-
7 expert tips for making your hens night a memorable one - November 6, 2020
-
5 reasons to host your Christmas party on a cruise boat - November 6, 2020
-
What to do when you’re charged with a crime - November 6, 2020
-
Should you get one or multiple dogs? Here’s all you need to know - November 3, 2020
-
A Guide: How to Build Your Very Own Magic Mirror - February 14, 2019
-
Our Top Inspirational Baseball Stars - November 24, 2018
-
Five Tech Tools That Will Help You Turn Your Blog into a Business - November 24, 2018
-
How to Indulge on Vacation without Expanding Your Waist - November 9, 2018
-
5 Strategies for Businesses to Appeal to Today’s Increasingly Mobile-Crazed Customers - November 9, 2018
Pistorius back in court for bail hearing on Tuesday
The Supreme Court last Thursday upgraded the 29-year-old athlete’s sentence to murder from “culpable homicide”, South Africa’s equivalent of manslaughter, for which he had received a five-year sentence.
Advertisement
Pistorius spent one year of a five-year sentence in jail for the lesser offense and then was put under house arrest at his uncle’s mansion in Pretoria in October.
The Paralympian will have to be in court by 9:30 tomorrow morning when his bail application is scheduled to start. “His (earlier) conviction has been overturned so his sentence from before has been scrapped, now he has to apply for bail”, Lusanda Ntuli, spokeswoman for the justice ministry, told AFP.
Eyewitness News understands that prosecutor Gerrie Nel and defence advocate Barry Roux have been in talks since Friday to reach an agreement on bail.
He also explaind that the date of sentencing will depend on the diary of the presiding officer. The appeals court imposed a murder verdict and sent the case back to High Court for sentencing.
The SCA’s ruling came nearly three years after Pistorius shot and killed Reeva Steenkamp, later stating he mistook her for an intruder.
The appeal decision, read by judge Eric Leach, said that it was “inconceivable that a rational person could have believed he was entitled to fire at this person with a heavy calibre firearm”.
Advertisement
The NPA has said it wanted the process to be concluded as soon as possible.