“In Congress, I’ll continue to stand with Planned Parenthood and other women’s health organizations that work to defend and protect a woman’s right to choose and promote women’s health”.
Advertisement
Justices Stephen G. Breyer, who wrote the majority opinion, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who wrote a concurring one, did a fine job of calling those lawmakers’ bluffs.
The CRR filed a petition for the Supreme Court to review the case in September of previous year. “It’s clear why lawmakers might have wanted to keep this information out of the public eye before the Supreme Court made its decision”. In the most important case involving abortion in more than 20 years, the court effectively said Monday that Texas can not pull an end run around women’s rights. There are no late-term abortion providers in West Virginia.
“I think we shut him down”, Chapman Pomponio said. Death from colonoscopy is 10 times as likely, and from liposuction, 28 times as likely, according to statistics cited in the ruling.
In Missouri, they will target admitting privileges and surgical center requirements.
Monday the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision striking down provisions of a Texas statute that threatened to close half of the state’s remaining abortion clinics.
With this law, basic preventative care, including breast and cervical cancer screening, birth control, STI and HIV testing as well as sexual health education programs for thousands of Floridians, would be much less available. Those most affected are young, low-income and rural women and women of color.
It was looking to head off a similar occurrence in Texas that legislators passed a couple of common sense regulations. The biggest decrease was in medication abortions – that’s a non-surgical abortion obtained by taking a pill.
The second document, from Hilltop Women’s Reproductive Clinic dated August 4, 2015, showed that the clinic performed an abortion on a minor without receiving the legally required parental consent first. They believe every abortion ends a human life. In its most sweeping decision on abortion since 1992, the court reaffirmed what it said at that time: If a law regulating abortion before the fetus is viable is more an obstacle to women than a benefit to them, then it violates the Constitution.
Although the law’s impact hasn’t been almost as severe – Planned Parenthood updated clinics to remain in compliance – it has clearly contributed to the lack of access for women, particular those living in poverty or in rural areas.
How dare any state attempt to pass common-sense laws that might infringe on a woman’s right to have her unborn child aborted in the womb.
The legal questions get more complicated once courts move beyond the sort of clinic regulations on trial in Whole Woman’s Health, and into the other types of legislation, where the supposed justification is no longer as cut and dry as it was with the Texas legislation. The Supreme Court on Monday found that those requirements created an “undue burden” for Texas women, especially those who live hundreds of miles from the nearest clinic.
Depriving women of their health care providers will only serve to further erode the reproductive health of women in our state.
Advertisement
Ginsburg’s opinion noted that laws like Texas’ “that do little or nothing for health, but rather strew impediments to abortion, can not survive judicial inspection” under the court’s earlier abortion-rights decisions. Because of the astronomical cost of these unnecessary renovations, the cost of legal abortions are driven up and access to clinics were restricted.
