The issue of which provisions to make legally binding (expressed as “shall” as opposed to “should”) was a central concern for many countries, in particular the United States, which wanted an agreement the president could accept without seeking congressional approval.
Advertisement
To ensure compliance, nations will meet every five years starting in 2020 and present updated plans on raising their emission cuts. The availability of such funds provides assurances to less developed countries along with direction on the need to eliminate dirty energy and invest in renewables, clean energy and transport in the coming decades.
“We welcome the adoption of a new, universal climate agreement at COP21 in Paris, which is a critical step on the path to solving climate change”, read a statement. Among progressive European leaders one may note a pronounced sense of ur-gency and a strong need for a global deal.
Oxford is in the lead in tackling climate change.
The Paris Agreement has reset the way we view our planet and our future. “Initiatives such as the Compact of States and Regions and the Under 2 MOU clearly demonstrate that delivery of a global climate deal is already underway and that global low carbon transition is inevitable, irresistible and irreversible”. In a book I coauthored on the effectiveness of multilateral environmental regimes, we argued that effective governance required attention to the cooperative environment among nations, building national concern among elites and the mass public, and building state administrative capacity for enforcing global commitments.
As the major leaders who were prominent in Paris have emphasised, this agreement is not ideal but it is a major step towards addressing the dangers of climate change.
“Governments across the world have now come together in the global fight against climate change but must play catch up”.
It was a huge achievement by Laurent Fabius, the French foreign minister and socialist, to persuade so many nations to agree. For the first time, 196 countries agreed to work together to limit global warming and to stop the rise of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible.
Incidentally, it was no surprise that none of the words “fossil fuels”, “oil” or “coal” appear in the agreement.
That investors should follow the smart money that’s already exiting fossil fuels. But the climate change revolution was the “most beautiful” revolution in its history.
The Paris Agreement itself is profoundly inventive document.
Most interestingly, for those who have been watching SunEdison’s performance of late, was its 12% jump on trading beginning Tuesday morning.
Thus, even though the euphoric sentiment on forging the Climate Agreements persists all around the globe, and within the country, doubts have been raised by various stakeholders. When countries formally join this agreement, starting as early as next April, they will include these emission reduction commitments in the Paris Agreement. It means we require credible plans to decarbonise our economies and protect the most vulnerable from the devastating impacts of climate change.
The Paris Agreement is a triumph for people, the environment and for multilateralism. At the same time, it defines differentiated responsibilities in the light of national circumstances.
Following the discussion, Special Envoy Stern will take audience questions. This inherent weakness will allow further proliferation of thermal power plants, especially in developing nations.
The Paris Agreement establishes a “mechanism to contribute to the mitigation of [GHG] and support sustainable development” that permits nations to earn credits, which can be used for compliance purposes, by suggesting strategies, projects, and efforts to reduce GHG and encourage sustainable development.
Advertisement
It is essential that certain details are elaborated upon while certain elements are strengthened. Sustained determination could be the difference between an agreement that deals with climate change and one that turns out to be another wasted opportunity.
