“While regional trade agreements do facilitate commerce among the countries they cover, they also hamper the optimal allocation of key factors of production at the global level through the diversions they often cause”, he pointed out.
Advertisement
But some are sceptical of China’s ability to achieve its larger goal at the summit, which is themed “Toward an Innovative, Invigorated, Interconnected and Inclusive World Economy”.
During his past nine trips to Asia, Obama has sometimes been distracted by other global developments from the emphasis he sought to place on boosting US military and economic ties to the fast-growing region, leading critics to doubt whether the USA commitment will last.
As part of its efforts to counter such concerns, China has been pressing its drive for expanded economic cooperation through its “one-belt, one-road” policy linking it to Central and Southeast Asia and the Beijing-backed Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
“It’s not a great time to be talking about free trade”, Prasad said, pointing to the growing electoral strength of anti-integration parties in the European Union, the success of Brexit in the United Kingdom, and the opposition of both major-party presidential candidates in the U.S.to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Encompassing almost 40% of the global economy, it would have opened American access to foreign markets, while also putting the USA out front in setting labor standards in the years to come.
On Monday, UN secretary-general Ban Ki Moon welcomed efforts under China’s presidency to “manage global headwinds and promote a new path for growth, trade and investment”. Many argue that Beijing’s role in setting the pace for the summit owes to the involvement of Rice, who has been labeled pro-China by USA allies.
Total GDP: $34.2 trillion (47 percent of world GDP). The European Commission says it would be worth 545 euros ($620) to each European citizen every year.
Obama faces another tricky meeting when he holds talks with North Atlantic Treaty Organisation ally Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, with relations strained over strategy on Syria’s civil war and concerns about Erdogan’s crackdown on opponents after July’s failed coup. But that looks a tall order now.
But the state-run Study Times wrote in mid-August that Western countries were trying to deliberately exclude a rising China and deny it a proper voice on the world stage with schemes like the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Who’s involved: The U.S. and 11 other nations dotted around the Pacific Rim: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.
In favor: Some economists say the TPP will boost income in the participating countries.
“In Asia, one of the challenges the USA has had throughout Obama’s presidency is one of reassurance: that we actually say what we mean what we say when we say we intend to rebalance to Asia”, said Derek Chollet, a former defense adviser to Obama.
Balazs Ujvari, research fellow at the Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations, said alongside the G20 summit themes of finance and trade, there is a special focus on innovation as a driving force of growth. “The evidence is it’s benefited a few and left a lot behind”, said Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel laureate economist.
Advertisement
The agreement will take legal effect when countries responsible for 55% of the greenhouse gas emissions sign onto it. In St. Petersburg, he met with a broad range of rights activists, noting that “a country’s strength ultimately comes from its people” and that “what makes a country democratic and effective in delivering prosperity and security and hope to people is when they’ve got an active, thriving civil society”. But that’s unlikely to happen. Both the main candidates in the November election, Republican Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, have come out against it, blaming past deals for destroying Americans jobs.
