“We want to make certain our customers have full confidence that our retail bankers are always focused on the best interests of customers”, CEO John Stumpf said in a statement.
Advertisement
The fines from federal and state regulators, however, are less than the more than $200 million that the stock in the company held by company’s chief executive, John G. Stumpf, is worth. The financial expert thinks Buffett most likely shares the sentiment of disgruntled employees and would be all in favor of “tying Stumpf up to the Wells Fargo stage coaches and letting the horses run”, Schiffer tells TheDCNF.
Some Wells Fargo customers have complained of similar allegedly fraudulent practices.
Wells Fargo officials told ABC News that the company set aside $5 million for restitution payments and have already paid out $2.6 million to affected customers.
As a parting gift, Tolstedt will earn a purported $93 million payday, according to The Financial Times, the lion’s share of which stems from the exercise of stock awards that she received from the bank along the way.
Wells Fargo reported second-quarter 2016 earnings of $5.6 billion, revenue growth of 4 percent compared to the previous year, and pretax preprovision profit up 5 percent year-over-year.
When the news first broke about Wells Fargo employees’ blatant fraud, there was widespread reporting about the employee’s behavior, but not a word was said about the culture which could have created such dishonesty, nor the higher-ups who were no doubt to blame.
The San Francisco-based banking giant declined to comment, as did the New York City office of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. Anti-Wall Street rhetoric has become a common refrain during the presidential campaign and some advocates are hoping to turn that populist anger into an aggressive legislative push to rein in the financial industry next year.
Debit cards were issued and activated, and PINs created, without telling customers.
“It’s inevitable that Wells Fargo will face a series of critical shareholder resolutions in light of this scandal”, Smith said in a telephone interview on Wednesday.
The phantom accounts meant that some customers were charged for insufficient funds, according to the regulators.
“It seems Wells Fargo’s board has equipped themselves with a broad enough tool that, if they think the situation warrants it, this clawback provision could (apply to Tolstedt)”, said Charles Tharp, a senior adviser at the Center for Executive Compensation. A customer with a checking account, for example, would be encouraged to consider a credit card or savings account.
The case has thrust the San Francisco-based bank into a harsh spotlight at a time when big US banks are still attempting to fix their reputations following the 2008 financial crisis.
“It was all management: their boss, then their boss, then their boss”, Mita Bhowmick, a former Wells Fargo teller, tells the Journal in regard to the sales tactics.
The US Senate Banking Committee has called a hearing to investigate the bank.
Advertisement
Wells Fargo, which is grappling with the fallout from claims that its employees created fake customer accounts, slumped 3.3 per cent to close at $US46.96 Tuesday in NY.
