Share

Why Apple’s EU Tax Issue Isn’t Good for Anyone, Even Apple

Noonan pointed out if Ireland took the money and Apple’s appeal to European Union courts was then successful it would have to be paid back.

Advertisement

First, she said Congress should increase taxes on big corporations like Google and Apple, noting that such companies relied on federal investment to get their start.

However, Nobel-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz told CNBC on Friday that the ruling was neither punitive nor unfair. As the parliament building is in the midst of an IT upgrade the vote on Apple, the world’s largest tech company, will be taken manually. AO avoided paying tax to any country on those profits by exploiting the cracks between Ireland and US tax rules: Ireland bases tax residency on whether a firm’s management and control resides in Ireland, and the USA bases residency on where a company is formed.

Follow CNBC International on Twitter and Facebook. “But the Commission is now calling to retroactively change those rules”. “To get to this meaningless 0.005%, the Commission completely ignores the fact that the vast majority of these profits were subject to USA taxation”, Sewell said.

The special sitting of the Dail comes after considerable protests by both Apple and the Irish authorities over the EC decision, which was made on the basis that low tax rates for Apple subsidiaries based in Ireland constituted illegal state aid.

Leader Micheal Martin said: “The attempt to paint Ireland as a rogue nation on tax has been ongoing for decades”.

The Commission also pointed out that the decision does not call into question Ireland’s general tax system or its corporate tax rate.

An aspect of the controversy over the European Union decision was that Europe was taking taxes from Apple that might have been eventually collected by the United States, if Congress ever passed corporate tax reform.

Ultimately, Warren wants big companies to pay more taxes.

Defending Ireland’s tax laws, the Taoiseach said that real reform of tax laws were underway in Europe.

Should it lose in the court, the commission also could adopt a new decision in line with the court ruling.

After the EU/ECB unfairly imposed 64 billion euro Frano-German bank debt on the Irish taxpayer in 2010, and Troika officials marched into the Irish ministry of Finance most people thought this economic and political disaster was the worst that could happen. “This is not a Commission finding that stands by a small country that has played by the rules”, the Irish prime minister said. Interest is payable from the date on which the unlawful aid was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery.

If the corporate income tax is zero, as it is in some countries, corporations would have more money to invest in R&D and new plant and equipment, enabling them to produce more at lower cost, benefitting their customers. “It is not how we do business”. He argues this would inspire US companies to invest in the United States again.

Advertisement

The difference is that they have benefited more from the moves in recent years. In 2004, a repatriation “holiday” setting a 5.25% tax rate on homeward-bound dollars (compared to a 35% statutory corporate tax rate) brought $312 billion home from overseas.

Dado Ruvic  Reuters